In conclusion, the Augustinian theodicy and the Irenaean theodicy are two sharply contrasted theodicies: the Augustinian theodicy which is also known as the “soul deciding” theodicy, stresses the role of the Fall, and sees evil as either sin or the result of sin; whereas the Irenaean theodicy, which regards evil as a requirement by a God of love to let his free creatures to develop from.
Another obvious flaw in the Augustinian theodicy is its contradictory nature; F.D.E Schleiermacher argued that to say that the world is perfect is logically false. He claimed that because we know that there is evil and suffering in the world, the world cannot be perfect, nor can it have been made perfect, as it states in Genesis 1 (“and he saw that it was good”) and in Augustine’s theodicy.
The Augustinian theodicy, named for the 4th- and 5th-century theologian and philosopher Augustine of Hippo, is a type of Christian theodicy designed in response to the evidential problem of evil.As such, it attempts to explain the probability of an omnipotent (all-powerful) and omnibenevolent (all-good) God amid evidence of evil in the world. A number of variations of this kind of theodicy.
Theodicy A theodicy is simply a justification of God’s ways. Theists are generally compelled to express a theodicy in response to the unfortunate, painful, evil events and circumstances found in our world. A theodicy is necessary only if we believe in a God who is inherently good, thus requiring an explanation of the apparent discontinuity between a good God and evil in the world.
The Augustinian Theodicy Essay. Throughout history, the problems of evil and suffering have always been prevalent in the world. The problems can be split up into two types: moral evil and natural suffering. Moral evil is generally viewed as anything that is caused by humans and inflicts pain.
When compared to the Augustinian theodicy of the original sin, which is provided as one way of reuniting the presence of evil and that of God, the Irenaean theodicy still stands out as the better one. This is because the Augustinian theodicy contends that evil exists as a form of punishment for engaging in sin at the Garden of Eden.
The Augustinian theodicy further assumes that evil is the consequence of free will as misused by man. McHugh (2006) also presented criticisms of the said theodicy by St. Augustine. According to him, the universe that God created might have gone wrong.
Thus, Augustinian theodicy argues that God created the world and it was perfect, without the existence of evil or suffering. This idea is supported in Genesis 1:31, where the Bible states that “God saw all that he had made and saw that it was very good.”.
As the more authentically biblical view, the Augustinian theodicy is based on the Bible and does not contradict the scriptures; it follows the traditional Christian interpretation of the creation story in the Genesis: God creates the world perfectly in six days, Adam and Eve----the ancestors of human beings---live in the Garden of Eden happily, until one day Eve is tempted by a serpent and.
A comparison of Augustinian Theodicy and Irenaean Theodicy Essay by rain0535, University, Master's, December 2007 download word file, 6 pages download word file, 6 pages 4.3 3 votes.
Augustine's theodicy is greatly influenced by the creation stories of the Old Testament (Genesis 1-3) St augustine theodicy essay. While thinking about Augustine's theodicy it is worth bearing in mind that he interpreted the Genesis story as a literal account of the origins of the world and also as a mythological story that communicated values and meaning.
Augustinian Theodicy Essay. 252 Words 2 Pages. The Augustinian Theodicy is a theory that believes Evil is due to the fall of humans and angels who went against God’s commands. It is a downwards and soul deciding theodicy, whereby humans fall from perfection and have to trust in Jesus’ death and resurrection for their salvation.
The problem of evil can be viewed as an inconsistent triad: (insert pic) The three are logically inconsistent. If God is omnipotent, he is aware of the existing evil and suffering and knows how to put a stop to it.. One of the principal critics of the Augustinian Theodicy is F.D.E Schleiermacher.
Augustinian Theodicy and Irenaean Theodicy Essay. The challenge of evil is a significant and long lasting philosophical and theological argument. A question is often raised and discussed: if God is usually both all-loving and all-powerful, then how do evils-including natural evil and moral evil—exist.
I will attempt to interpret the article, Soul-Making Theodicy, and clarify the authors’ views on Christian theodicy and potential reason for evil in the world. Summary In the article, Soul-Making Theodicy, Hick argues that the Augustinian ideology that permeates Western Christian theodicy, or the free will defense, is both inadequate and unsatisfactory in explaining the presence of evil.The Protestant and Reformed reading of Augustinian theodicy, as promoted primarily by John Hick, is based on the writings of Augustine of Hippo, a Christian philosopher and theologian who lived from AD 354 to 430. (54) The Catholic (pre-reformation) formulation of the same issue is substantially different and is outlined below.Theodicy: Free Will and Natural Evil Essay A theodicy is simply a justification of God’s ways. Theists are generally compelled to express a theodicy in response to the unfortunate, painful, evil events and circumstances found in our world. A theodicy is necessary only if we believe in a God who is inherently good, thus requiring an explanation of the apparent discontinuity between a good God.